← Back to the Overview
Deep Dive · Enterprise AI ROI Measurement

The Evidence Map for Enterprise AI ROI Measurement

The action layer behind the core verdict: how to turn the briefing into a sponsor-ready decision without overstating the evidence.

Source  Storm Research Verification  23 original claims checked Prepared for  Leader discussion
How to use this

Use this as a value-realization map before an AI initiative goes to a sponsor, steering committee, or board. The point is not to kill experiments. The point is to stop soft measures from being promoted into hard-dollar claims before finance has a way to recognize them.

First moves before hiring anyone

01
Make finance own the baseline before the pilot starts.

Ask the controller to define the before state, counterfactual, denominator, and ledger line. If the AI team owns the baseline, mark the result as an internal signal.

02
Classify the initiative as efficiency or positioning.

Efficiency plays need hard-dollar discipline. Positioning bets need option-value framing and explicit exemption from quarterly ROI promises.

03
Report cashed versus redeployed time.

When hours saved are claimed, separate cost actually removed from time reinvested into more work. Most productivity claims die in that second column.

04
Put shadow costs in the denominator.

Governance, system integration, change management, token spend, security review, and support all belong in the business case before approval.

05
Pre-empt survivorship bias in multi-year ROI stories.

Compare the client against its own full cohort of attempts, not industry averages that exclude failed or abandoned deployments.

Owner, briefing, proof

Owner

Finance-owned baseline and value-recognition rule, not an AI-team estimate.

Briefing

Efficiency or positioning decision brief, with the measurement standard named before the pilot starts.

Proof

A ledger bridge that separates task gain, workflow change, cashed savings, redeployed capacity, and shadow costs.

Where to start

Start with one AI initiative, one finance baseline, and one proof path. If the gap is material, widen to a readiness look at AI value measurement, and build the operating cadence only when the sponsor wants it run.

Claim ledger

23
Checked
citation claims or clusters traced to primary or strongest reachable sources
1
Fabricated
invented or unsupported source clusters removed from the public claim set
8
Corrected
wording narrowed after source review
4
Demoted
useful signals kept out of the headline
ConfirmedDellAcqua BCG RCT: Task gains verified inside frontier, with correctness loss outside frontier.informs.org
ConfirmedMETR developer RCT: Experienced developers were slower with AI in a narrow preprint setting.arxiv.org
DemotedMIT NANDA 95%: Useful directional P&L signal, but preliminary and self-selected.mlq.ai
ConfirmedGartner AI abandonment forecasts: Analyst predictions verified, not audited outcomes.gartner.com
CorrectedKPMG AI Pulse: Benefit claims retained; unverified significant-ROI splits omitted.kpmg.com
CorrectedMcKinsey State of AI: Budget and EBIT-impact facts corrected; fabricated 86/29 pairing removed.mckinsey.com
ConfirmedWorkday productivity loss: Nearly 40% of AI time savings lost to rework, vendor research.workday.com
CorrectedFuturum ROI metric shift: Productivity metric decline re-attributed from Terminal X to Futurum.futurumgroup.com
ConfirmedAccenture GenAI bookings: Bookings and revenue are audited actuals, not client ROI proof.sec.gov
CorrectedNVIDIA data-center revenue: Audited FY2025 revenue retained; unsupported mid-2026 run-rate removed.nvidia.com
CorrectedBig-tech capex guidance: Forward guidance rounded and treated as guidance, not actuals.cnbc.com
ConfirmedMeasurement-layer consolidation: Arize and Galileo evidence supports captured-measurement concern.arize.com
ConfirmedSolow productivity paradox: Historical analogy verified with venue correction.brookings.edu
DemotedERP failure literature: Useful historical context, weak failure definitions.springer.com
DemotedNucleus CRM ROI series: Opaque, vendor-adjacent ROI series kept as illustrative only.nucleusresearch
CorrectedRPA failure rate: EY attribution corrected; unverified Deloitte detail dropped.ey.com
CorrectedBCG AI value gap: 10/20/70 treated as effort allocation, not measured value split.bcg.com
CorrectedAcemoglu macroeconomics of AI: TFP figure corrected and kept as forecast-model evidence.nber.org
ConfirmedGoldman adoption tracker: Time savings mostly reinvested, not cashed.fortune.com
DemotedShadow AI prevalence: Lenovo survey retained directionally, not as ungoverned deployment count.lenovo.com
ConfirmedIBM breach cost: Security-cost context verified as vendor report.ibm.com
ConfirmedProsci AI trust gap: Change-practitioner survey supports adoption and trust gap.prosci.com
CorrectedEnterprise 2x mandate preprint: Throughput evidence noted; not a P&L ROI result.arxiv.org
What would change our mind
Deep Dive staged from verified Storm Research · nothing here asserts above the registry calibration